Suppose I should have mentioned that my example was in c# using UniObjects
.Net.  I have been able to see that using the readlist method allows the
program to run much faster, simply putting the select list into a loop and
reading one record at a time runs noticeably slower.  I didn't have this
problem with the com based uniobjects or with the uniobjects for java
library (even when I ran that under c# and .net).  I've seen another post
that referred to an updated dll, but when I tried to obtain it I was told by
my var that it's not available.  Now, I've also run up on a problem with
writefield as it performs a consistent seg fault when used.

I'm a bit perplexed by how UniObjects for .net was written.  An example is
with the writefield method itself.  Instead of following the pattern laid
out by UniObjects for Java, the programmer(s) chose to shuffle the order of
the arguments to this method making it a nuisance to switch back and forth
from one library to another.  Not a big deal when your going to use only one
environment, but still an oversight that could have easily been taken care
of with a bit of attention to detail.
-------
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to