woooooooooooo

I was trying to make a joke.

Sorry.

Not about the "extemely sharp individual" part though - I was sincere.

I would never insult anyone on this list as it is an incredibly valuable 
resource for me.  And... I enjoy reading from people who have great knowledge 
and a passion for what they do.   

Sorry for any offense taken.  I assumed it would be obvious that I was joking.

Once again though, thanks for all of the help.
-------------- Original message -------------- 

> Oh, absolutely you misunderstood! Reference to "the brain" was not a 
> reference to an individual or self, but rather that amorphous mass of 
> grey matter that sits between the ears of each of us. Understanding 
> how this mass works -- if only in the slightest way -- can be useful 
> information in leveraging that mass more effectively. 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 10:49 AM 
> To: [email protected] 
> Subject: [U2] [UV] making 00001 our of 1 - THANKS AND SORRY 
> 
> I just wanted to say thanks to everyone who responded to my question. 
> Basically, I was looking to find any code in our system that could 
> possibly be adding leading 0's to our item number since we are 
> converting from a fixed 5 digit item number to a variable length 
> number. With the help of the list (once again), I can file another 
> project away in the success drawer. Thanks very much to all! 
> 
> I also wanted to say that I am sorry for starting any holy wars. 
> 
> Oh yeah, and Kevin... 
> 
> While I would agree from reading many of your posts that you are an 
> extemely sharp individual, I have to tell you that it is really 
> irritating to people to hear others refer to themselves in the third 
> person (ie. "the brain"). Or... Did I misunderstand yet another 
> e-mail. Haha JK 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Scott 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> 
> > Spacing is "overly grand"? Though I can't cite specifics, I do 
> recall 
> > a study done several years ago that talked about the ergonomic value 
> 
> > of whitespace in code. At the risk of misquoting, it seems the brain 
> 
> > interprets whitespace as a natural terminator when reading through 
> > code, and makes it easier to interpret variable names like ASDTFY or 
> 
> > DRT. By contrast, the brain has to manually interpret = as a 
> > terminator (and the next statement) and it slows down the overall 
> > comprehension. 
> > 
> > ASDTFY = "" 
> > DRT = "" 
> > 
> > When the brain sees the first space after the variable, it 
> understands 
> > that the previous whatever-it-is is complete. Then when it sees the 
> > equal symbol it can comprehend the meaning of the symbol 
> independently 
> > of the variable. Secondly, when assignments (and the like) are 
> aligned 
> > like this it tends to reinforce the relationship between the 
> > variables, which may be otherwise indirect. By contrast: 
> > 
> > ASDTFY="" 
> > DRT="" 
> > 
> > When the brain sees the = after the variable, it has to first sort 
> out 
> > an ambiguity. Is this the termination of what was shown prior, or 
> > something new? In truth, it's both, and then both have to be 
> processed 
> > as equal priority until the brain can establish any other form of 
> > precedence to establish which is more important. This is then 
> > complicated by the fact that one must read to the end of the 
> statement 
> > to determine there is no additional context for establishing 
> > precedence, which only complicates the mental process to a greater 
> > degree. Also, by having no alignment, there is no relationship 
> implied 
> > in the variables, even though they are being assigned in tandem. 
> This 
> > further reinforces the ambiguity. 
> > 
> > So in summary, you can write code as compact as you wish, but 
> > understand you do so at the risk of self-imposed (and otherwise 
> > unnecessary) mental strain. 
> > 
> > -Kevin 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > http://www.PrecisOnline.com 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 4:57 AM 
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] making 00001 our of 1 
> > 
> > Mark, 
> > 
> > I'm one of those programmers who use the "overly grand" way of 
> spacing 
> > you describe. I believe that 
> > 
> > ASDTFY = '' 
> > AS = '' 
> > DRT = 0 
> > 
> > is much more readable than 
> > 
> > ASDTFY='' 
> > AS='' 
> > DRT=0 
> > 
> > especially when there is a lot more code than in this example, and 
> > everything else around it is crammed together as tightly as it can 
> be 
> > as well. Code is written for the human as much as the compiler, and 
> I 
> > like it to be as easy to read (and spot errors) as possible. 
> > 
> > This spacing won't bother a find program if you wrote it or have the 
> 
> > source, and teach it better. 
> > 
> > My 4 cents. 
> > 
> > Regards, 
> > Charlie Noah 
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
> > writes: 
> > 
> > [snip] 
> > P.S. If you use my concept, you may want to have your search strings 
> 
> > contain no spaces and convert to "" the spaces in each reviewed 
> line. 
> > There is a overly grand way people program with spaces between 
> > operators and even though the complier doesn't care, FIND programs 
> or 
> > the editor will miss them if they don't match exactly. 
> > 
> > My 3 cents. 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Barry Brevik" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
> > 
> > 
> > > >I have always used "R%5" but I may miss programs 
> > > >that use other techniques to arrive at the same result. 
> > > >Can someone give me examples that they have seen for changing 1 
> to 
> > 00001? 
> > > 
> > > I don't want to start a religious war, but I think it is 
> completely 
> > normal 
> > > to use: 
> > > 
> > > NBR = NBR "5'0'R" 
> > > 
> > > or 
> > > 
> > > NBR = NBR"5'0'R" 
> > > 
> > > Barry 
> > > ------- 
> > ------- 
> > u2-users mailing list 
> > [email protected] 
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
> > ------- 
> > u2-users mailing list 
> > [email protected] 
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
> ------- 
> u2-users mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
> ------- 
> u2-users mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to