Mats, Check out the "NO.RETURN.WARN" compiler option.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid Sent: Friday, 20 May 2005 2:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [U2] Include Vs Call - Software Maintenance We use functions heavily - having an include for each project with up an over a hundred deffun's - and I only have two issues/complaints with them. First the need to have deffuns and second, the spurious warning messages we get at compile time for internal returns not having a return value . I mean they don't return anything and IMNSHO shouldn't have one. ( We use return (dum) as a workaround ) -- mats DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
