it's UV.
All the locks are RU i.e READU locks.
The record ids are not too long have confirmed it with LIST.READU INTERNAL
command also. They are the same.
Yes the device ids are also the same.
From: "Stevenson, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [U2] Reg output of LIST.READU
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 02:43:03 -0400
From: shuchi bhandari
> i had another query reagrding the output of LIST.READU command.
>
> On running the command, we got multiple lines of records that
> were exactly similar i.e. all the parameters inncluding the
> inode number; process id and Item id were the same.
>
> Is this a case of multiple locking of the same databse file
> by the same process? Can someone explain.
I am assming UV, not UD.
1. Are these READL locks and not READU locks? There can be multiple
READLs on the same record. They will show up as either "RL" or "RU"
under the Lmode column.
2. Are the Record IDs too long to fit the screen and they differ only in
the rightmost bytes where you can't see them?
3. Does LIST.READU INTERNAL show the IDs different than the others?
4. I assume the Device column is also the same. (It would be a little
strange that inodes would happen to match on files across 2
file-systems, files that happen to share the same ID scheme.)
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
_________________________________________________________________
Claim your space online! http://www.msn.co.in/spaces Share your world for
free!
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
