If more people care, they whould weigh in. Clif moved it into the U2UG Enhancement committee's queue. I'm on that committee so I'll take it up there, but the more voices the better.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Haskett > > Charles: > > No, you guys aren't the only ones. This is a pretty > miserable hole in the mvDbms functionality. However, since > we've been writing this stuff for years the routines are > already built to solve our problems. I just didn't know > TRANSACTION bracketing was going to break them. > > Unknowns like this are the reason we haven't implemented > transactions, as we haven't been eager to rework some core > functions in our application. > > Bill > > > > Would this be a worthwhile enhancement request through U2UG? > > Are Ken and I the only ones whining about this: ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
