One downside to this, is that you need to know HTML and javascripting.
Basically, the output are UV programs that produce HTML coding. There is no
automation with these programs/routines. And the output HTML is not
cross browser compatible, unless that's the HTML output you provide.

But...It works, and it doesn't use any license seats either, it uses
phantoms,
so it could function in a limited way using the UV PE, on Redhat and apache.

George

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 7:39 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [U2] Using httpout / UV based webserver / images?
>
>
>George, do you, or would you be willing to, have your code up
>on the pickwiki ?
>
>Will Johnson
>Fast Forward Technologies
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: George Gallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:42:41 -0400
>Subject: RE: [U2] Using httpout / UV based webserver / images?
>
>
>The cgi writes the environment varibles to a file using the
>PID as the ID,
>  then waits for that PID to appear in another file, which it sends the
>contents
>  of that back through the browser.
>
>On the UV side, I have a phantom that monitors the first file
>for any new ID's
>(PIDS)
>  which it then looks at (one of the environment/http varibles
>tells what
>function it is),
>  and tosses it off to the appropriate program, which does it
>thing, and
>creates HTTP output
>  which it writes back tothe second file (using the PID) for
>the cgi to give
>back to the user.
>
>the cgi knows nothing of UV, just that it writes a file, and
>reads a file.
>and UV knows nothing of the cgi, just it gets data and writes
>creates data.
>
>One nice feature, is that the UV and the webserver "could" be
>on two different
>machines, as
>long as they can share two directories (files), one for cgi
>output, and the
>other for cgi input.
>(good for security, if the webserver is hacked, the UV server is not).
>
>It works, but sometimes is a little slow. So I considered
>eliminating the
>apache side, and puting
>the server function in UV as well.
>
>George
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to