Glen,

Thanks for the help.  UVCONFIG ALL shows 64BIT_FILES = -1.

Weird that I could RESIZE to 64bit eh?

Thanks,

Scott

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> It's odd that you could convert the data file (which would have at some 
> point done a mkdbfile with a -64BIT option) yet cannot create indexes. A 
> few things could cause that particular message to be generated by 
> mkdbfile: 
> 
> 1) Your system doesn't support 64 bit files (which we know is patently 
> false for HP at that revision), 
> 
> 2) Your uvconfig value for 64BIT_FILES is either set to negative value (or 
> the shared memory value of it is bogus), 
> 
> 3) You INDEX.MAP file is corrupted and the sequencing code is getting 
> confused, or 
> 
> 4) I have no other guesses. :-) 
> 
> I believe it would have been safer to remove the indexes, then convert the 
> data file over to 64bit, then recreate each index. That would keep 
> everything in sync. To fix that, you could use SET.INDEX to remove the 
> index pointer in the data file header (abandoning the existing index 
> directory), then re-create all the indexes over again. Not the most 
> elegant solution but it would work. 
> 
> Hope this helps. 
> _________________________________________________________ 
> "I reject your reality and substitute my own" - Adam Savage 
> 
> Glenn M. Herbert - Connectivity Development Engineer 
> Information Integration Solutions, IBM Software Group 
> 50 Washington Street Westboro, MA 01581 
> 508-599-7281 direct 
> 
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 07/05/2005 01:09 PM 
> Please respond to 
> u2-users 
> 
> 
> To 
> [email protected] (u2-Users) 
> cc 
> 
> Subject 
> [U2] [UV] indexed 64 bit files 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> UV9.6.1.1.14, HPUX 11 
> 
> I converted a file that had secondary indices to 64bit. Now I cannot 
> create any new indices on it. Anytime I try to do this the CREATE.INDEX 
> program just hangs for a while and returns the message "Unable to generate 
> unique index file name!". I put a debug statement in the CREATE.INDEX 
> program and found that the mkdbfile command was returning the error 
> "mkdbfile: Enhanced files (64bit) are not currently supported o n this 
> platform.". 
> 
> My question is this... Is it ok to change the CREATE.INDEX program to 
> force mkdbfile to use the -32BIT option instead of -64BIT? The total 
> size of the index file will never ever reach 2g. 
> 
> Thanks for any help. 
> 
> Scott Thompson 
> ------- 
> u2-users mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
> ------- 
> u2-users mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to