If you really want to debate the issue, contact either Ian Sandler or Harvey Rodstein. The syntax came from one of their books.
Personally, I'm looking into the future and seeing a "THREAD CLOSED" message from the moderator. Charlie Rubeor Unix/Database Admin The Wiremold Company 800.338.1315 x3498 860.523.3690 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/27/2005 11:48:14 AM: > In a message dated 7/25/2005 11:38:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > The distinction with using an EOF variable is that it is not referenced, > > until the next READNEXT. Each new variable that is read into memory will > > push the EOF variable further to the back. This definitely caused frame > > faults (I think that's what they were called) on Advanced Pick. On either > > U2 systems or on properly built systems, I doubt it makes a bit of > > difference, it might even slow things down. > > Charlie this is not correct. The map location of the variables is determined > at compile time and not moved after that point. You can confirm this for > yourself by looking at the variable map table. So if the location mapped for > your EOF variable is 0080 that will not change no matter what the program > RUN-time engine does. > Will Johnson > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
