I agree with the <=, >= etc use of the chevrons is cluttering with dynamic arrays. However since the = sign by itself is pretty consistent, EQ may be overkill. I do use NE though. My 1 cent.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Morrissey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 3:03 PM Subject: [U2] GT vs > (was RE: U2 Users Digest... (really Standards)) > I've been trying to stay out of this thread, but I've got to say a big OH > YEA to this one. > > Our language is too littered with <> and = to consider using them as > conditional operators too. > > A while back I was asked in an interview about "coding philosophy" or > something like that. When I replied that I ALWAYS use GT instead of a > greater-than-sign the interviewer jumped to his feet and shook my hand. > > - Ross > > -----Original Message----- > ... > UNTIL EOF EQ 1 DO ;* use 'EQ' to determine values not '=' > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
