Somebody out there has a product for sale which allows you to turn
green-screen apps into gui apps with little to no effort.  They still have a
gs look, so the transition's easy for the user, but you get all the
advantages of being able to do the standard editing in a gui input box, etc.

I can't remember what it's called or who puts it out, and I can't get to the
web to research it right now ... but someone else should recognise what I'm
talking about.

-Keith

----Original Message----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [U2] Using Esc

> Despite the progress made with conversions from green screen
> to GUI, my
> client base for example is virtually 100% green screen. I've
> been adding a
> few Accuterm GED programs but not to any huge extent.
> 
> I believe that the providers should catch up with the times,
> especially Raining Data and IBM. They should recognize that the
> conversions from green
> screen to GUI do not happen overnight and it is truly an
> extremely large
> undertaking to consider re-writing legacy code for a gui
> interface. I'm not
> talking about re-developing the apps, just trying to make
> them a little more
> modern.
> 
> One client would like their legacy Order Entry app re-written in a GUI
> interface. I'm truly afraid that my cost for this project will be
> prohibitive and that it may never happen. Thus adds another
> frustration. 
> 
> Nothing embarrasses me more than having to explain to a client's new
> employee that they have to re-type the whole answer if they
> spelled Apt 4B
> instead of Apt 4A on a long address line. That tiny piece of
> time starts off
> their relationship on a tremendous backwards note. Granted we
> know that the
> apps are sophisticated underneath. But the employee's
> shrugging shoulders
> speaks volumes.
> 
> Perhaps what I'm hearing is that RD & IBM will turn their back on this
> concept and, like many things, it's in my hands. So I'll re-deploy my
> GET.ANS() subroutine and try to tweak it for my different client's
> environments. Most users are not cut & paste oriented. They
> just want to get
> to the end of 123 East South Street NW, Apt 4B and replace
> the B with an A.
> I don't blame them for condemming the application (and thus
> the database)
> with such a tired user interface.
> 
> MS QuickBasic didn't provide any <Home><End><Del><Insert>
> kind of INPUT
> statement. It actually provided too many INPUT formats so I
> had to write my
> own. Fortunately there were no terminal emulations or other
> 'environments', just DOS.  Now, anyone programming with VB doesn't
> concern 
> themselves one
> bit with these shortcomings. It's part of the environment.
> 
> My 2 cents.
> Mark Johnson
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Leach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [U2] Using Esc
> 
> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> AFAIR UV does provide cursor driven input - see the Input
> @, KeyEdit and
> KeyTrap statements. It is however pretty horrible.
>> 
>> You can't blame the vendors for this one though. The
> problem has been the
> mindset of a community that hasn't shared code (how many
> virtually identical
> menu runners or input subroutines have I seen over the years)
> even though
> the runtime binding model of external subroutines makes it so easy...
>> 
>>  I doubt the vendors would be interested in extending a 20
> year old text
> interface when you can download the free VB 2005 Express,
> UO.Net and do it
> all properly ...
>> 
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>>     From: "Mark Johnson"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     Sent:
>>     19/12/05 05:25:10 To: "u2-usChis case MS got it right. Every
>> input 
> behaves very much
> like every other
>>     with the special keys.
>> 
>>     I believe that this should be accomplished by the providers
>>     themselves, ie Raining Data and IBM in their future releases.
>> They 
> already interpet
> the
>>     TERM setting and it would remove the differences. I
> took my GET.ANS
> and
>>     tried to fit it on Accuterm and couldn't get the proper
>> backspace. ------- u2-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to