So what is wrong with typing in SORT VOC WITH @ID LIKE "...LIST_..."
If I remember correctly Unidata followed the Prime INFORMATION usage rather
than the PICK usage.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Haskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidata on XP Lap Top
Tony:
It's amazing how much one constantly fights with the dbms, isn't it? :-)
Way too much is illogical or is segregated between Pick mode, which is 30
years old, and "U" mode, which doesn't work well for Pick like
environments.
For instance, in "U" mode something so simple like 'SORT VOC = "[LIST_]"'
fails miserably. :-(
One always has to ask the question, why would IBM and UD make it so
difficult to work in, or move to, this environment? :-)
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidata on XP Lap Top
George Smith wrote:
> I would like to propose to upper management that we replace
a single
> user laptop program using a non-pick database with a Unidata single
> user system. We would use C# and the uniObjects for the gui
front end.
> This would be on about 400 laptops if successful.
> Anyone doing this and would like comments from the group.
I have Unidata PE on my laptop with XP Pro for
development/testing with DesignBais and mv.NET, both of which
can use UO for connectivity. I haven't had any problems -
outside of being a D3 guy who desperately needs a "U2 for
Pick Dummies" book. :)
Rather than letting the system auto-start the services, I
start/stop the environment with a single click on BAT files
on the desktop. (Provided here on request.) I do this to
eliminate CPU/memory usage when the environment isn't in use.
That said, UD only has a modest 15MB RAM footprint and zero
CPU usage when inactive, so it doesn't interrupt other
processes anyway - this is probably what you're interested in.
The only other comment I would make is that it might be
appropriate to get licenses for production systems, rather
than running on personal/development licenses. I don't
recall what the actual license text has to say about this.
Side comment: One of these days I wish the MV DBMS Vendors
would pay attention to requests like this and create "Lite"
versions of these environments with no BASIC compiler, no
spooler, no editors, no telnet or serial services, etc. -
just a low-profile runtime-only that's easy to install and
use with a GUI client, and for a similar cost. So far I
think the only candidates we have for this now are Revelation
OpenInsight and QM.
HTH
T
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
