Ken - the nightmare was in the time and effort to get it setup for 100+ accounts and 1000 users. Once done it did work, tho they did have the odd hickup.
On 1/19/06, Ken Wallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Symeon Breen wrote: > > > > I know some people who did the transaction logging and replay trick a > > few years ago on unidata before it got replication - turned into a bit > > of a nightmare for them, tho in the end it did the job. I think os > > level would be best. > > Then they can't have put the right amount of time and effort into setting it > up. DR via RFS archiving works fine. > > The problem with OS level replication is that it works at a block level and > at any point of time if you have an outage the replica database may look > fine at the OS level, but be physically corrupt as far as the database is > concerned. > > Database replication is best done be the database even if you have to bend > it out of shape to make it work! > > Cheers, > > Ken > ------- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
