This approach is absolutely awful from software design point of view. I personally would hate to have to support software when it is the calling program that decides the flow of the program that is been called. Do you really need this?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Brevik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2-users (E-mail)" <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:03 PM Subject: [U2] [UV] GOSUB variable-name? > I would like to pass a variable (let's call it "SUBNAME") to a subroutine, > and this variable would contain the name of an existing label which I will > call "TEST". > > The subroutine can then do GOSUB TEST, but GOSUB SUBNAME will not compile. > > Aside from CALL @VARIABLENAME, is there any way to branch indirectly in > universe? This would be really useful for me. > > Barry Brevik > ------- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
