True, I am not an OOP. However I have studied it and I did use it when
taking courses during the 80's one of which was Pascal. The Windows
reference is just an example and not, by any means, the only use of OOP. I
just don't think that U2 is missing anything by not having it built in.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Serguei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 4:03 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] GOSUB variable-name?
You not an OOP expect, are you?
I have been using OOP since it appeared in Turbo Pascal long before and
"windows tools" appeared and our current Java code calling Universe
programs
has nothing to do with "windows tools" (our application has an HTML
browser
interface). Only those who do not know anything about OOP think that it
has
anything to do with Windows.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Banker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] GOSUB variable-name?
Not a limitation, you build your own objects. Objects after all are
nothing
more than subroutines that perform a specific task. You may even say that
it
is an advantage because you are not tied into doing what someone else has
decided how something should work. You create your own. Almost every
company
I have worked for has had a different way of display and storing
information. It's only when using windows tools that they will settle for
what they get because they have no choice.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Serguei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One of those limitation - no OOP.
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
