I agree...and although slightly different, I believe that Oracle made the same mistake more than a few years ago (8i) when they introduced nested tables and the use of pointers (presumably to appease the OO crowd at the time):
http://www.dbforums.com/t525306.html -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F. Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [U2] FW: On data models, data types and dangerous liaisons | The Register {Unclassified} Well, on a 'first reading', I think I agree with everything the author wrote. The author has posted a follow-up to the "multi-value harmful" article, it's here:- http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2006/07/22/data_models/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
