I gathered it was an End User speaking on developing an application with a
SOA interface in U2, so I'm bummed. I thought this would have been
interesting and very informative...

If the SOA session at 4:15 on Wednesday is cancelled, I wish they would move
TUU-1458A (Securing U2 for IOD SOA) into that slot!  I know of a couple of
us who would like to attend that session, but have an imperative to see the
SystemBuilder Technical Overview to see the "Version Next" that makes SB+ a
part of VisualStudio... 

And actually, the SystemBuilder session should be interesting!  I'd
recommend anyone who has active development at least look at SB+ again -- in
my mind, the costs involved with the RunTime aspect are likely mitigated by
the standards and speed to completion, ESPECIALLY if you're doing mainly
'in-house' or 'small base' coding and development.  SystemBuilder shields
you from the 'interface changes' that usually plague small development
efforts -- the reason so many products are still character based is the cost
to get to GUI.  SB+ sets out so that each shift in the paradigm has been
evolutionary instead of 'start from scratch' -- we're hoping the
evolvoltioin to Vista Aero presentation works as smoothly.

Anyway, the SB+/SOA classes at the same time was another of those conflicts
that surprised me -- I could see putting UniData and UniVerse classes at the
same time, as those usually are two different groups - people are aligned
with one or the other - but SB+ and SOA Archictecture I didn't see as
mutually exclusive.  Especially when IBM should be doing whatever they can
to get more people reviewing and into SystemBuilder with the upcoming
changes to make it an 'add-on' to VisualStudio! U2 has always been missing a
'front end' - SB+ **IS** that front end.  And if you can use VisualStudio to
boot (aside from Microsoft now getting their development tax as well!) then
we will have a GUI anyone can develop with.

See you at IOD...


DW
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to