A good (caution, long and technical) look at IPV4 address consumption: *http://tinyurl.com/bplzg*
Article bottom line: At current consumption rates the entire IPV4 address pool is projected to be allocated by Sept 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Might I be so bold as to point out that the pictures are misleading? They > represent only about 1/4th of the available addresses because they show > only class 'a' networks. If they showed a picture of class 'c' networks, > the numbers would be staggering, on the side of availability. Can anyone > spell > 'factorial'? > > My 2-bits, which makes absolutely no difference in what's actually going > to happen. It feels nice to be of so little consequence. > > Karl > > <quote who="Robert Colquhoun"> > >> Hello, >> >> Just for reference: >> http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/IPv6.ars >> (...if too technical, just look at the pictures ;-) >> >> Am in the pessimists camp about conversion, unless there is a big >> crunch on ip addresses as the article suggests might happen. Too many >> applications have hard coded ipv4 addresses and associated logic. >> >> Pulling discussion back on subject, does ibm's device licensing on u2 >> support ipv6 networks? Do the various SYSTEM() calls that return ip >> address work? >> >> - Robert >> ------- >> u2-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ >> >> > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Schasny - Denver, Co, USA jschasnyATgmailDotcom ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
