Actually, this could be a VERY OLD "feature" ... :-) I seem to remember it being documented that HASH.HELP and HASH.HELP.DETAIL (or similar) had a habit of disagreeing with each other on Prime INFORMATION. Now that's going back some ... !
Anyway, the advice always was "don't trust HASH.HELP. Suck it and see" Cheers, Wol -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2007 15:12 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UV HASH.HELP error Sorry I forgot the subject line the first time. I've also tested this on our Linux system running the same revision with the same results. Jerry -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: I just came across what may be a bug in HASH.HELP. I ran HASH.HELP on a static hash file and it told me the smallest modulus should be 80015 (yes, not a prime number), smallest separation or 4, and the best type of 10. I then ran HASH.HELP.DETAIL on the same file and got 80021, 4, and 18 respectively. In this second case the modulus is a prime number. No changes were being made on the system because it is our test system and I was the only one on it at the time. This was on Solaris 8 running Universe 10.1.12 in Reality flavor. ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
