I'm running 10.2.0 on windows. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:50 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
Sorry for the error on my part. It took me a while to figure that out myself when I tried to find it on another client ;-)..... What version of UV are you running? My environment is UV 10.2.4 Enterprise on RHEL 4.0 using SSH. (This is not officially supported). It doesn't work. I get the following error file in the accuterm directory and also in the dynamic control directory when trying that with telnet. U2devlic.err 11:26:08 06/28/07 pid = 3180 U2GetMachId(): unable to get host information of hostname Error = 131 12:56:16 06/28/07 pid = 1748 U2GetMachId(): unable to get host information of hostname Error = 183 13:06:10 06/28/07 pid = 1748 U2GetMachId(): unable to get host information of hostname Error = 183 Does anyone know what that means? Cheers, Phil. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ward Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2007 3:46 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing Good call Bill. Mine is 3.0.3049.0 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:33 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing David: You might try "...\Atwin\u2licn.dll". Mine's dated 10/28/04. Bill >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ward >Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:17 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing > >There is no such file on my system. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker >Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:59 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing > > >David, > >What version of the uvlicn.dll are you running? > >Cheers > >Phil. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ward >Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2007 11:46 a.m. >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing > >I finally resolved the issue. I reloaded and reauthorized, then >downloaded accuterm as someone suggested. I was able to write a quick >uniobjects routine and connect with accuterm at the same time. > >Thank you to all who replied > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins >Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 3:46 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: [U2] Device Licensing > > >As others have posted: > >Device Licensing works for both U2 databases as long as you have a >license which is one of: > >* Workgroup >* Enterprise >* Server with device licensing (a recent offering) > >In order that this will work you need a TELNET client that supports >Device Licensing, and as there have been some changes in DL internals >over time >they should also concurrent in release - ideally (of course) the latest >releases or fairly close. > >IBM supply SBClient, wIntegrate and Dynamic as Telnet clients that work >with DL - on wIntegrate and DC you need to remember to check the "Use >Device Licensing on Unix" check box if that is you server platform. >DL will also >work with UniObjects and ODBC (for example) thought you should >read up on >the use of subkeys for UO. > >Some 3rd parties have arrangements with IBM to use the DL software >libraries with their software, and they offer DL compatibility with >their TELNET clients. It is worth noting the point above though, DL >internals have changed over time. You might find that older versions of >the TELNET clients >may not work correctly froma DL viewpoint with more recent >copies of the >databases. That being the case then an upgrade from your friendly local >TELNET client provider to a current build with updated software should >resolve it. > >Issues which got in the way in the past related mostly to combinations >of "stty" settings in Unix, all (even vaguely) recent versions >got the code >modified so that's not an issue. There was also an issue more >recent) where >ODBC sessions (for example) used a different DL user pool to TELNET >sessions. So ODBC would allow up to 10 sessions as one >license, and TELNET >would do the same - but each connection would use a separate >slot. In those >circumstances (for example) one UO and one TELNET would take 2 licenses >(fixed). > >Always a useful test - try using Dynamic Connect from the current >client software............that should work fine and act as a check on >any 3rd party software. > >Hoping this answers any queries - please post if any follow-ups. > >Regards > >JayJay >------- >u2-users mailing list >u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ >------- >u2-users mailing list >u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ >------- >u2-users mailing list >u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ >------- >u2-users mailing list >u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
