You mentioned your replaced certain verbs with a remote items and that it failed.
What exactly were you trying to do? The whole idea of putting remote items and using a security subroutine was designed to be as transparent as possible. Regards, David -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bartman, George Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 7:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [U2] User activity - SOX compliance I guess I should have elaborated on the ideas we had any why we didn't think they would work. Here is what we tried and or thought about: We tried to modify the actual commands like COPY, ED, etc to replace them with Remote items but our software vendor uses different syntaxes for all the commands we wanted to monitor. This we used in a limited production test that had some less than desired results (read catastrophic failure) that we had to pull out and are very leery to try again. We are also a heavy user of UV/Net and the creation of triggers would prevent us from using some of our toolset. Before we tried something ourselves again I was asked to see if a vendor has something specifically for this. I didn't see anything good on the U2 business partner list so I figured I'd post the request here. George Bartman Lead UniVerse DBA Omnicare, Inc. Office: (614) 652-3288 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
