So, it would have to be an "inside job" .... necessary in order to determine syntax of underlying query anyway --> and files to remove :-) but if you were going to leave the subroutine as evidence, you may as well have buried directly into compiled code anyway (and of course these critical changes would not appear in the source code left behind for the auditors to look at).
Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage > Better by Design! >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hona, David S >Sent: Monday, 29 October 2007 6:34 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] Stringing commands together on the command line. >Possible? > >Yes, I wondered the same thing... > >EVAL is designed to "emulate" an I-type dictionary item. Hence, will >only execute any command that you can successfully compile within an >I-type. So it wouldn't allow what you have in your example. > >You'd need a subroutine that could execute via EVAL to invoke a TCL or >OS command indirectly. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris >Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 6:13 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] Stringing commands together on the command line. >Possible? > >Don't have access to UV at present, but wonder if the following INPUT >would do the "trick" > >> ' AND WITH EVAL "EXECUTE 'CLEAR.FILE CLIENT'" = ' > > > >Ross Ferris >Stamina Software >Visage > Better by Design! >------- >u2-users mailing list >u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
