On Dec 5, 2007 9:11 AM, Jeff Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > My point is that the [AD] tags don't add any value for the reader, in my > opinion. The world is not so simplistic that a post can be easily > classified as [AD] and I find it a bit insulting for someone else to > pretend that they can add tags to something that will guide me in my > interpretation. > [snip] >
It seems to me that the only relevant [AD] tags are for job openings and product announcements. Note that both of these imply a "start of thread" or "original post." I see no reason to preface legitimate replies with [AD] tags, even if the reply consists of only "my product does that." It also seems to me that the only person on this list arguing for more [AD] tags is Charles. Does anyone else actually feel that [AD] tags help to clarify responses in any way; or that that the list has a problem with a lack disclosure of some posters' possible commercial self-interest? I move to stop the [AD] nagging. /Scott Ballinger Pareto Corporation Edmonds WA USA 206 713 6006 ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
