Thanks all!
I am new at this company and I am also back in universe after many
"moons cycles" in jBASE but I will try to get them to allow me to fix
these processes.
> I'm not sure, but wasn't there some discussion a while back stating
> that multiple UV processes initiated via cron would be fine if each
> process had their own unique process group id (not just a unique
> process id)?
I am not sure I fully understand what's going on, why would not having a
unique pgid cause this issue?
dougc
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 1:38 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] anyone seen this error before?
I don't know about perl, but I am *guessing* that would work. An
early solution (circa 1997/8) was to use a little program written in
C to do the same thing. I've have to search my records or the list
archive to dig that out.
But it begs the question, why not just use PHANTOM? Are you assuming
some doubling of processes or overhead that really isn't there? I'm
not understanding why you would think hammering the process grp id is
preferable to letting PHANTOM take care of it for you.
Maybe I'm missing a nuance here.
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
