Brian
The generated XML did include both nodes as shown in my example.
using 10.1 gives
<ROOT>
<REF.CODES_XML>
<TABLE_GENDER>
<TABLE_GENDER_VA-MV/>
... etc
using 10.2.7 gives only one of the nodes
<ROOT>
<REF.CODES_XML>
<TABLE_GENDER_VA-MV/>
... etc
I would have been happy to lose the <REF.CODES_XML> node but not the
node defining the item within the file.
Have we found a bug where the wrong one has been eliminated.
Sara Burns
Sara Burns (SEB)
IS Development Manager
Public Trust
Phone: +64 (04) 978 4534 (DDI)
Mobile: 029 978 4534
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
The information contained in this communication (including any attachment) is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
communication. You must not disclose, copy or use in any way the information
contained in this communication. Any views expressed in this communication are
not necessarily the views of Public Trust. No representation is made that this
communication is free of error, virus or interference.
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
