Brian Leach wrote:
Hi
I thought about adding code folding to mvDeveloper, but with Pick/Basic it
doesn't really work in the same way.
If you have a language that is function or member based, there is a very clear
boundary for each function, e.g.
Could a mild folding (fold the ones there is no dispute about) work? If
it worked 90% of the time (but 100% correct) I would use it. Just leave
the indeterminate ones un-folded.
I have tinkered some with folding in vim with U2, but I have not worked
it into my workflow yet.
Good examples Brian.
private void doSomething{
code in here
}
which makes it easy to collapse.
The problem with Pick/Basic is that there isn't always a clear boundary.
If your subroutines are all like this, it will work:
GoSub MySubroutine
MySubroutine:
code here
Return
But an IDE or editor has to be able to cope with bad style/design as well as
good, so you may have the following:
If SomeTest Then
GoSub MySubroutine
End Else
GoSub JumpIntoTheMiddle
End
MySubroutine:
If SomeTest Then
Return
End
(code)
(falls down into...)
JumpIntoTheMiddle:
(some more code)
Return
Here you have overlapping labels, and more than one return. Which means that
the boundary isn't clear. It can be done, but it makes it more complicated.
Brian
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
