I had a process that would spin off multiple phantoms, each putting a shared lock on a control "group" record. When each child phantom finished, it would release its shared lock. When the main process was able to obtain an update lock, it knew all the child processes had completed and it would "close" the group.
Is that the kind of thing you're asking about? BobW -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:35 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] [UV] Shared Record Locks Has anyone a real-world application where UniVerse shared record locks are used? I'm struggling with when they would be preferable to using an update record lock. Anyone willing to "share" their experiences? Thanks. Perry Taylor ZirMed 626 West Main St , 6th Floor Louisville, KY 40202 www.zirmed.com <http://www.zirmed.com/> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. ZirMed, Inc. has strict policies regarding the content of e-mail communications, specifically Protected Health Information, any communications containing such material will be returned to the originating party with such advisement noted. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
