On 10/21/2010 3:05 PM, Symeon Breen wrote:
I think this has been a big driving force in the nosql movement - massive
databases with high avail and high transactions are very common these days,
To do these types of systems in oracle or sql server would require rooms of
servers and complex architecture, many of these databases like Cassandra,
Hadoop etal tackle this problem.
U2 could be good in this arena as it is a small footprint fairly fast
simplistic interface, but it falls a long way short fulfilling these
distributed, and horizontal scaling requirements that many of the nosql
databases excel at.
tp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Our pricing structure also takes U2 out of the running for most non-mv
shops. CouchDB, Redis, MemCacheD, Riak, MongoDB, et al are all stiff
competition.
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
