Thanks, Colin.

The SQL requirement is there as this is an interface into non-U2-type
systems, and the programmers and high-end users of those systems use SQL.
UniQuery is foreign to them.

I'll chew on your wrapping suggestion a bit. Maybe I can do something like
that.

I'm with you on the cleanness of the results in EXECUTESQL. If I can get
over this conversion hurdle, it'll be really nice.

Thanks!

Jonathan
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/-UD--How-to-get-output-converted-results-from-EXECUTESQL-and-READNEXTTUPLE--tp31498024p31505501.html
Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to