I have no direct knowledge, but I suspect that the remote differential compression used by DFS would need to examine the entire file to determine changed blocks, and with a non-trivial UV file of a couple of hundred megs, I imagine that the overhead would be LARGE. However, if you were looking at this as a periodic update mechanism for a mirrored server (say, on a nightly basis), rather than attempting real time database replication changes, you might be in business :-)
All speculation on my part, and happy to defer to someone with firsthand knowledge, but if you could share an insight to the result you are trying to achieve, others may be able to provide a more accurate response. Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage > Better by Design! -----Original Message----- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2011 8:04 AM To: U2 Users Group Technical Subject: [U2] Windows DFS Replication Is anyone using Windows DFS Replication with UniVerse on Windows Server 2008? Jerry _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
