It was confirmed that UOJ isn't going away, which is good for
legacy development.
But my whole point was that for new development we don't need it,
never did.

> From: Charles_Shaffer
> Tony, What you say is true, and those tools would be 
> great in the right situation.  But I am concerned 
> about the future of UOJ.  My understanding is that the 
> new Domino will allow jars to be directly accessed 
> from the Domino Designer.  Just want to make sure that 
> UOJ is not going to be deprecated.
> --------------------
> Tony said:
> There's no good reason for that condition to exist.  
> Rocket doesn't necessarily need to be the sole 
> provider of language bindings into the platform.

U2-Users mailing list

Reply via email to