Will:

Thanks very much for the link.  My numbers by memory where a bit off,
it's even worse than I had remembered!

Harold

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [Suspected Spam] Re: [U2] File Sizing using concurrent option
AND FAREWELL


http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/157058/sap_project_costs_c
ited_in_jewelers_bankruptcy_filing.html









-----Original Message-----
From: Oaks, Harold <harold.o...@clark.wa.gov>
To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org>
Sent: Wed, May 23, 2012 2:21 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] File Sizing using concurrent option AND FAREWELL


It was a Company in Portland Oregon, here where I live.  The "Shane
ompany", a jeweler.  Used to run a lot of local radio ads, then the ads
uddenly stopped.   Turns out they went bankrupt.  In bankruptcy
roceedings they mainly blamed the costs incurred by the SAP system
rought in to replace their in-house customized Universe-based system.
he SAP implementation was supposed to cost $8 million, but costs were
ear $19 million when the company went out of business.  I the
ankruptcy proceedings the company mainly blamed the SAP implementation.
fter bankruptcy they resurfaced, which we know as the radio ads came
ack on a few months ago after being off about a year.  However - the
ds have stopped again.  Perhaps they are just saving advertising
ollars for now? Or is it worse?
But what really burns me up:  I did a google search on this very thing 2
ays ago and came across a blogger who was defending SAP, his deal was
hat the install failure was Shane Company's upper management's fault.
rrrr!!!  If any company agrees to pay $8 MILLION dollars for a system,
he vendor had better provide all the help needed to get the system up
nd running successfully or that vendor has failed. 
How about you MV providers, do you ever help the customers do an
nstallation?  Or do you take the money and let 'em do the best they
an?  And if they fail, it's their fault??
I'm just rehashing what I've read.  I'd really like to hear from one of
he programmers or analysts that worked for the Shane Company when all
his happened.  Are you out there?
An even more damaging a story, if possible, is the implementation of SAP
o serve the City of Portland (once again, my home city, but this time
t involves my tax dollars).  I don't know too many details except that
t was supposed to unify 19 separate systems into one, and
mplementation was to cost about $20 million (already outrageous), but
ne attempt under an outside SAP implementation specialist failed, a
econd implementer hired from way out of town also failed, finally SAP
hemselves came in (where were they all this time?) and it seems finally
ot the job done.  Cost at this point: almost FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS
actually about 48.6 million, but what's an extra 1.4 million dollars?)
 recently asked a high-up analyst in the police department how the SAP
mplementation was doing, and they said, "Oh - OK I guess - there are
till some problems."
Thanks for listening-
arold Oaks
r. PA
lark County, WA
-----Original Message-----
rom: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Horacio
ellegrino
ent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:16 PM
o: U2 Users List
ubject: Re: [U2] File Sizing using concurrent option AND FAREWELL
I remember a company that went bankrupt because they spent so much in
AP (
r was it Oracle? ) It was in the news.
Anybody?
HP
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Dawn Wolthuis
dw...@tincat-group.com>wrote:
> I have only seen SAP implementations from a bit of a distance and
 through reading stories, but in every case, my understanding was that
 those in charge of the project were gone before SAP went live. I have
 seen systems analysts and programmers survive the project, with plenty
 of stories once they do. It sounds like a really brutal ERP
 installation. I have not kept current on this front enough to know
 that people were still selecting it, although a whole lot of people
 are still maintaining it.

 Best wishes, Scott, and thanks for taking the time to write up your
 notes regarding some of those in the industry who have helped you.
 Cheers!  --dawn

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Holt, Jake <jh...@samsill.com> wrote:
 > I thought no one actually ever finished implementing SAP?
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
 u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
ggch...@comcast.net
 > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 1:31 PM
 > To: U2 Users List
 > Subject: Re: [U2] File Sizing using concurrent option AND FAREWELL
 >
 >
 >
 > Don't worry, we're not going to implement anything that's going to
o
 damage.  Well, unless you call the outrageous cost a damage :)
 >
 >
 >
 > Any thoughts on the CONCURRENT option?
 >
 >
 >
 > ----- Original Message -----
 >
 >
 > From: "Wjhonson" <wjhon...@aol.com>
 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:14:19 PM
 > Subject: Re: [U2] File Sizing using concurrent option AND FAREWELL
 >
 >
 > Well you used to be.  After SAP sucks ten years out of the life of
our
 company, we'll see
 >
 >
 >
 > << I am being moved to our corporate office to join a eam of 10 who
ill
 be learning, configuring, and customizing SAP to meet the eeds of the
est
 wine and spirits distribution company  in the world.  Ok, I'm
 >  little partial...  >>
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: iggchamp <iggch...@comcast.net>
 > To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org>
 > Sent: Wed, May 23, 2012 11:11 am
 > Subject: [U2] File Sizing using concurrent option AND FAREWELL
 >
 >
 >
 > Hi All,
 >
 > uv 10.2.7 / hpux 11.11
 >
 > First things first (skip this section if you don't care for
oodbyes)...
 >
 >
 > I wanted to say thanks to all of the contributors to this list.  I
ave
 learned
 >  tremendous amount from all of you.  The passion that many of you
ave
 for your ork is really inspiring.  I am being moved to our corporate
ffice
 to join a eam of 10 who will be learning, configuring, and customizing
AP
 to meet the eeds of the best wine and spirits distribution company  in
he
 world.  Ok, I'm
 >  little partial...   All of you deserve a great deal of credit for
y
 pportunity as you have all contributed to the things that I've been
ble to
 ccomplish with my current system.  Without the great system that we
ere in
 llinois have developed, I'm sure that noone would trust in my
bilities to
 eliver in a different environment.
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > blockquote>
 >
 >  special thanks to a couple of people I have been blessed to work
 directly ith.  I cannot recommend their services enough!
 > /blockquote>
 >
 >
 > blockquote>
 >
 >
 > ony Gravagno ( http://www.nebula-rnd.com/ ):  When each division of
WS
 was
 > sked to provide a web service that would interface our sales force
 automation
 > nits to our business systems, I was terrified.  I had never had the
 opportunity
 > o work with web technology and, based on a heavy workload, did not
ave
 the
 > ime to dive in at that time.  I did take the web developer that
niverse
 > ffered for a spin.  Pretty cool tool.  While I was able to develop a
eb
 > ervice that could work had I set the requirements myself, I could
ot
 get it to
 > eet the requirements that corporate was developed.  I even worked
ith
 one of
 > he IBM engineers and he could not get it done.  Keep in mind that I
ave
 always
 > elieved in my abilities to provide solid solutions using the tools
hat
 we have
 > n the multivalue world.  It killed me to have to bring in a resource
 from the
 > utside.  I swallowed my pride and turned to Tony.  I was amazed at
he
 > ncredible service that he provided.  He developed a service for me
hat
 has
 > een rock solid.  I am still amazed that I have never had to revisit
t
 after
 > ears of pounding by our sales force.  This is plug, play, and forget
 about it
 > t its best!  Not only that but our web service which provides
ncredibly
 > owerful and complicated pricing blows the web service developed on
ur
 > orporate as400 system out of the water from a performance
tandpoint.
  Thanks
 > ony, you've made me look a lot better than I really am :)
 > /blockquote>
 >
 >
 >
 > eff Fitzerald ( http://www.fitzlong.com/ ):  Your write-ups on file
 performance
 > ave really helped me to ensure that our system is always operating
t a
 high
 > evel.  I wish I could get everyone around here to read it.  I was
lso
 > ortunate enough to have been allowed to use your file maintenance
 product -
 > AST.  I can't tell you how much time that this saved me.  When I
irst
 arrived
 > t this company, all the files were dynamic.   I made the mistake of
 converting
 > hem all to static because I believed the performance was much
etter.  I
 was
 > ight and the system was screaming.  The reason I use "mistake" is
hat it
 > brought me into a whole new world of ensuring the thousands of files
 used by
 > he application continued to perform by spending all my weekends
izing.
  Yuck!
 > y allowing me to break away from managing the monster that I had
reated
 by
 > sing your product, I had my weekends free again.  Yay!  Not only
hat,
 your
 > roduct was doing a much better job than I ever did.  Unfortunately,
 budgets
 > ere cut and  I could no longer continue to use it.   Thanks Jeff,
ou
 helped me
 > o spend my time moving the company forward by developing great tools
 rather
 > han maintaining files.
 > /blockquote>
 >
 >
 > ILE SIZING question:
 >
 > As mentioned, I'm moving on.  Before leaving I'm trying my best to
ase
 the
 > urden on my friends  here in Illinois by automating many of the
hings
 that I
 > ever got around to doing for myself .  That being said, I put
ogether a
 > outine that will analyze our files and resize as necessary.  It's
retty
 slick
 > ut not near the software offered by fitzlong.com - refer to previous
 section.
 >
 > I would like to set it up to execute from cron so that noone has to
 babysit.
 > eing the scaredy cat that I am, I've always phantomed off the
rocess and
 > onitored over the weekend to ensure that noone is accessing the
iles in
 > uestion.  I put the CONCURRENT option in there as a safeguard but
ever
 really
 > rusted it enough to turn the program loose without policing.
 >
 > My questions regarding CONCURRENT  are these:
 >     1.   Is the option trustworthy enough to use on a live system
hile
 users
 > re possibly accessing the files?
 >    2. Are there any sort of performance issues?  In other words,
ould a
 file
 > hat takes 2 hours to size take 8 hours to size while users are
 accessing?  The
 > outine keeps a history of various statistics including how much time
t
 took to
 > o its business.
 >    3. Does it slow the application that is accessing the file?
 >    4. Any other considerations?
 >
 >
 > hanks in advance for your response  and for all of the tremendous
elp
 that
 > ou've all been over the years.
 >
 > Scott Thompson
 > ______________________________________________
 > 2-Users mailing list
 > 2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
 > ttp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > U2-Users mailing list
 > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
 > _______________________________________________
 > U2-Users mailing list
 > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
 > _______________________________________________
 > U2-Users mailing list
 > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users



 --
 Dawn M. Wolthuis

 Take and give some delight today
 _______________________________________________
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


-- 
*hp*
______________________________________________
2-Users mailing list
2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
ttp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
This e-mail and related attachments and any response may be subject to
public 
isclosure under state law.
______________________________________________
2-Users mailing list
2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
ttp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

This e-mail and related attachments and any response may be subject to public 
disclosure under state law.
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to