I understand the performance trade off between dynamic and dimensioned arrays but I'm curious about quantifying.
I know the answer will depend on hardware and load, but in general at what point (length) do dimensioned arrays become better performing than dynamic? 1000? 10000? 100000? Any examples or benchmarks appreciated. Jeff Butera Sent from my iPhone On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:14 AM, "David L. Wasylenko" <d...@pickpro.com> wrote: > Speed > There is a *long* thread here demonstrating the difference between *DAYS* of > processing and seconds, using large records for demonstration. > > ... david ... > > David L. Wasylenko > President, Pick Professionals, Inc > w) 314 558 1482 > d...@pickpro.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org > [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:16 AM > To: U2 Users List > Subject: [U2] Array Types > > I am surprised that anyone uses dimensioned arrays. I use dynamic arrays for > everything. > > If there are any advantages that dimension arrays have over dynamic... please > let me know... without getting sentimental. > > --Bill > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
