Rolf - Wonderful example, thank you. But I am confused: If Bel is to be a lower bound, how can you assume A1 and A2 are independent? Shouldn't a lower bound assume the worst case interaction between A1 and A2? If not, what does Bel mean? And if we do assume worst case, wouldn't that be that A1 and A2 are mutually contradictory (P(A1 And A2) = 0)? This would give a Bel(R) = 0, no? tnx - Bruce
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Jonathan Weiss
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Geoffrey Rutledge
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions WANG Pei
- How new evidence revises current belief. Kevin S. Van Horn
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Joseph Halpern
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Alex Kozlov
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Rolf Haenni
- Databases for Bayes net data Fabio Gagliardi Cozman
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Kevin S. Van Horn
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Rolf Haenni
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Bruce D'Ambrosio
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Jonathan Weiss
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Judea Pearl
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Judea Pearl
- RE: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Hansen, Peter Friis
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Rich Neapolitan
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Gordon Hazen
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Jonathan Weiss
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: Bayesian Networks and Belief Functions Judea Pearl
