> This month's Skeptical Inquirer is devoted to "Science and religion"
> (although most issues tackle these!). Interestingly, no arguments are
> provided from a Bayesian perspective. If Bayesian reasoning is the
> scientific method of dealing with degrees of belief, it's curious that the
> scientific community is slow in adopting it.
Here is an article I've come across:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/peter_wilson/bayes.html
I haven't had the chance to go through it carefully;
hopefully the more expert members of this list could comment
on it.
Ryan T. Sammartino
"Ancora imparo"
http://members.home.net/ryants/
