Kathy, Good answer. I believe something along these lines can be made to work. Of course, you *don't* get the fuzzy rules, which are truth-functional and hence insensitive to the nature of dependence between propositions. (See Elkan etc., cited in AIMA.) But an interesting calculus might emerge. Notice that making the proposition be "X says P in context C" brings in a distribution over contexts and speakers as well as the value of P itself. I drafted some of this for inclusion in AIMA but decided against it, not wishing to seem too probabilist-imperialist with Lotfi in the next-door office. Stuart
- [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Hansen, Peter Friis
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Bruce D'Ambrosio
- RE: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Hansen, Peter Friis
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Lluis Godo
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Scott Ferson
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Herman Bruyninckx
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Scott Ferson
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Taner Bilgic
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Stuart Russell
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Lluis Godo
- Re: [UAI] Fuzzy sets vs. Bayesian Network Ronen Brafman
