Interesting and how about using v0.1.2? I am writing my script for the
present version?
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Fernando Takai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Ok, I never really used this function, but i tried today - and i found that
> CmdUtils.injectJavascript calls CmdUtils.getWindowInsecure. Well, for me
> (using the dev version - latest tip) it was giving a
> CmdUtils.getWindowInsecure is not defined - I had to change it to getWindow,
> and it worked.
>
> Sample:
>
> CmdUtils.CreateCommand({
> name: "inject",
> preview: function( pblock, input ) {
> },
> execute: function(input) {
> CmdUtils.injectJavascript("
> http://www.prototypejs.org/javascripts/prototype.js",function(){
> CmdUtils.log(CmdUtils.getWindow().Prototype)
> })
> }
> });
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:33 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps Atul can shed some light? Strangely enough the members of the core
>> development team have been silent on this??
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Aurimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Here http://hg.toolness.com/ubiquity-firefox/rev/9432d68f963f it says
>>> that: "instead of using file:// to inject jQuery we use resource://.
>>> We can't use chrome b/c chrome URI's can't be included in content
>>> code."
>>> Does it mean that I can include other js files only with resource://
>>> URIs ?
>>>
>>> On Nov 28, 4:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> > What version of Ubiquity are you using?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Aurimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I've tried that and it says "CmdUtils is undefined":
>>> >
>>> > > CmdUtils.injectJavascript('file:///c:/ubiquity_commands/script.js',
>>> > > Utils.safeWrapper(function(){
>>> > > CmdUtils.getWindowInsecure().loadCommands();
>>> > > })
>>> > > )
>>> >
>>> > > Contents of script.js:
>>> > > var loadCommands = function(){
>>> > > CmdUtils.CreateCommand({ ... ... ... })
>>> > > CmdUtils.CreateCommand({ ... ... ... })
>>> > > ... ... ...
>>> > > }
>>> >
>>> > > On Nov 28, 11:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> > > > I think there are examples in the ubiquity source code itself:
>>> >
>>> > > > CmdUtils.loadJQuery = function loadJQuery(func) {
>>> > > > CmdUtils.injectJavascript(
>>> > > > "resource://ubiquity-scripts/jquery.js",
>>> > > > Utils.safeWrapper( function() {
>>> > > > var contentJQuery = CmdUtils.getWindowInsecure().jQuery;
>>> > > > func(contentJQuery);
>>> > > > })
>>> > > > );
>>> >
>>> > > > And I think injectJavaScript does exactly that (3rd line of the
>>> above
>>> > > code).
>>> > > > However, it will become a lot clearer once there is more info on
>>> how the
>>> > > > callbacks work (lines 4-6 above).
>>> >
>>> > > > - Mayuresh
>>> >
>>> > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Aurimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > I want to keep my commands in several separate JS files. How can
>>> I
>>> > > > > load them into one main script?
>>> >
>>> > > > > On Nov 28, 12:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> > > > > > No, that does not work. For some reason the Utils.safeWrapper
>>> appears
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > be
>>> > > > > > required. I wonder why?? Actual code is as follows:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > ...
>>> > > > > > CmdUtils.injectJavascript(
>>> > > > > > strJSUrl,
>>> > > > > > Utils.safeWrapper( function() {
>>> > > > > > var remoteObject =
>>> > > > > CmdUtils.getWindowInsecure().remoteObject;
>>> > > > > > displayMessage( "Within callback " +
>>> remoteObject
>>> > > > > > .remoteAttribute );
>>> >
>>> > > > > > //This is the bit I am having trouble with
>>> > > > > > remoteObject.a( input.text, ???); // ??? is
>>> expected
>>> > > to be
>>> > > > > a
>>> > > > > > string!
>>> > > > > > })
>>> > > > > > );
>>> > > > > > ...
>>> >
>>> > > > > > In any case, I am happy to have moved ahead a bit. I come to a
>>> point
>>> > > > > where I
>>> > > > > > can see the message notification.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > Here's a further question on how handling callbacks from
>>> methods
>>> > > within
>>> > > > > the
>>> > > > > > external JS? Especially when it is a string??
>>> > > > > > Doing the standard route with a
>>> >
>>> > > > > > remoteObject.a( input.text, function( data ) {
>>> displayMessage("data =
>>> > > " +
>>> > > > > > data); } );
>>> >
>>> > > > > > does not work!
>>> >
>>> > > > > > Any pointers?
>>> >
>>> > > > > > tia..
>>> >
>>> > > > > > - Mayuresh
>>> >
>>> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:21 PM, gtdphp developers <
>>> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > But It's the callback bit I cant seem to
>>> > > > > > > > fathom. I need to be able to do something on the lines of
>>> (this
>>> > > is
>>> > > > > > > > pseudocode):
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > var myRemoteScript = CmdUtils.injectJavascript( "
>>> > > > >http://xyz/script.js";
>>> > > > > > > );
>>> > > > > > > > var myRemoteObject = myRemoteScript.MyObject;
>>> > > > > > > > myRemoteObject.a( some_params );
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > Try something like:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > CmdUtils.injectJavascript( "http://xyz/script.js";, function
>>> > > > > > > myremotescript() {
>>> > > > > > > var myRemoteObject = myRemoteScript.MyObject;
>>> > > > > > > myRemoteObject.a(some_params);
>>> > > > > > > });
>>> >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Mayuresh
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Mayuresh
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mayuresh
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fernando "Takai"
> http://flickr.com/photos/supeertakai
> http://fernandotakai.jaiku.com
>
> Get Ubiquity: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Ubiquity/
>
>
> >
>
--
Mayuresh
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ubiquity-firefox" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
