I'm not sure to understand your questions about the context... but I'm
also curious if this work for your application, can you give it a try?

An alias is a wrapper around references to the external command
functions, it uses the previewCommand and executeCommand utils.

On Feb 26, 4:54 pm, GooseusTheGreen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks good, but I'm curious if this will work for my application...
> does the context that is passed in to the execute function
> automatically overwrite the external commands context or does the
> command author have to write that in?  Also, is an alias just a
> wrapper around references to the external command functions or is it a
> local copy of those functions?
>
> It seems that if the latter is the case then having a bunch of
> commands which are separately making aliases of other commands would
> bloat the command namespace... I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better
> to allow command authors to expose mini-command-apis for use by other
> commands which could then be accessed via a CmdUtils method?
>
> On Feb 26, 3:34 am, lrbabe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You should have a look at my proposed additions to the API related to
> > alias creation, you're likely to find some answers and I'm interested
> > in the results you get when using it:http://gist.github.com/61752
>
> > On Feb 26, 4:46 am, GooseusTheGreen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Alright, looks like this could work so long as the command doesn't
> > > reference any variables in the local sandbox.
>
> > > for instance, I'm trying to execute the "email" command, but
> > > unfortunately it requires the context variable to get the document of
> > > the focused window.  Are there any plans to allow the email command to
> > > have the document passed in (along with any other needed parameters)?
> > > I suppose I shall just snag the necessary code for a local email
> > > function.  Any other interest in this sort of thing?  What are the
> > > feelings on command chaining?
>
> > > On Feb 25, 6:48 pm, GooseusTheGreen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Alright, looks like these (pulled from mouse.js, suggested by atul in
> > > > another post of the same sort) is the functions I need.  Am I
> > > > correct?  Any plans to develop this functionality in to CmdUtils or
> > > > another library?
>
> > > > function getUbiquity(){
> > > >   var mainWindow = window.QueryInterface
> > > > (Components.interfaces.nsIInterfaceRequestor)
> > > >                      .getInterface
> > > > (Components.interfaces.nsIWebNavigation)
> > > >                      .QueryInterface
> > > > (Components.interfaces.nsIDocShellTreeItem)
> > > >                      .rootTreeItem
> > > >                      .QueryInterface
> > > > (Components.interfaces.nsIInterfaceRequestor)
> > > >                      .getInterface
> > > > (Components.interfaces.nsIDOMWindow);
>
> > > >   return mainWindow.gUbiquity;
>
> > > > }
>
> > > > function getCommandByName( name ) {
> > > >   var ubiq = getUbiquity();
> > > >   return ubiq.__cmdManager.__cmdSource.getCommand( name );
>
> > > > }
>
> > > > function executeCommand( commandName, mods ) {
> > > >   var cmd = getCommandByName( commandName );
> > > >   var selText = CmdUtils.getWindow().getSelection().toString();
> > > >   selText = selText || LAST_SEL_TEXT;
> > > >   LAST_SEL_TEXT = selText;
>
> > > >   cmd.execute( {}, {text:selText}, mods || {} );
>
> > > > }
>
> > > > On Feb 25, 6:33 pm, GooseusTheGreen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Alright, maybe I'm having trouble with my wording here.  What I'm
> > > > > looking to do is make a command that grabs information from a web
> > > > > service and then puts it in a new email to my contact.  For
> > > > > instance...
>
> > > > > get-asset-to-email (assetID) (email)
>
> > > > > Everything is fine, but I am not sure how to access the other commands
> > > > > (ie email) from within my command... is this not possible yet?  I
> > > > > can't imagine being forced to rewrite the "email" command in to my
> > > > > command function just to do this.
>
> > > > > Can I maybe send a command to the ubiquity command line from within my
> > > > > function?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ubiquity-firefox" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to