WUnderground seems the best freely available service that provides 
world-wide coverage (someone please find a better one to prove me 
wrong!). So yes, to do better would require using locale-specific 
services. Which of course means its harder to implement & maintain, but 
the user experience should improve drastically. Would still need to use 
WUnderground as a fallback though - for locations without a 
locale-specific service. So really, that's just hiding the problem from 
certain people.

Another alternative is to use a seperate geocoding service. Send the 
user's input to the geocoder, which returns its parse of the input, then 
we send that to WUnderground in a standardized format. The location noun 
could really do with that ability anyway, regardless of whether its used 
in this specific case.

- Blair




On 30/06/09 6:20 AM, Jono DiCarlo wrote:
>
> Could we solve the problem by switching to a different weather
> service?  There's no particular reason we have to stay with Weather
> Underground.  I'm not real familiar with the alternatives, but maybe
> one of them will do a better locale-independent parsing job?
> --Jono
>
> On Jun 29, 7:47 am, satyr<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> http://gist.github.com/90316
>>
>> Attempted to fix the query problem by allowing the user to set the
>> default location.
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2:16 am, Heather<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> What it comes down to is that within the United States, Wunderground
>>> really only reliably returns a match for a "city, state" combination.
>>> "city, state, united states" doesn't work well, nor does "city, united
>>> states".  It doesn't matter if you use commas or not - as soon as you
>>> add "united states" to your query, wunderground chokes.
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ubiquity-firefox" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to