I'm not sure it would be any worse than the M series would be... just not gain 
you much. OTOH, it may actually have a higher transmit power per modulation. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Tim Kerns" <[email protected]> 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2014 3:43:58 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 AC trial was a bust..... 




Yes, I agree 

My point, which I did poorly of bringing out, was, in its present state, the 
5AC is not very use full because of its limited freq band. And it doesn’t seem 
to handle noise as well as the 5M 






From: Rory Conaway 
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 1:22 PM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 AC trial was a bust..... 



Tim, you don’t have an apples to oranges comparison. Since your 5.8GHz band is 
clearly screwed up, you are going to have to wait until DFS becomes available 
to find out the actual difference. 

Rory 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Tim Kerns 
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2014 1:06 PM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 AC trial was a bust..... 




But the Rocket AC5 can not be used in DS space 






From: Mike Hammett 

Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 1:01 PM 

To: Ubiquiti Users Group 

Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 AC trial was a bust..... 




:-\ 

I use DFS space for most of my backhauls where that space is available. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




----- Original Message -----


From: "Chuck Hogg" < [email protected] > 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2014 2:58:43 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 AC trial was a bust..... 

Haven't really tried or needed to...I think we're limited to 20mhz anyway 
because of interference on both sides. 





Regards, 
Chuck 



On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


How stable have they been at larger channel sizes? 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Chuck Hogg" < [email protected] > 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2014 2:56:07 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 AC trial was a bust..... 




The RocketAC PtP Lites for us have been relatively stable...130Mbit in a 20mhz 
channel. We're almost at 6 miles. 





Regards, 
Chuck 



On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


You should have had -55 at that distance with 2' dishes. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Tim Kerns" < [email protected] > 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2014 1:22:48 PM 
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 AC trial was a bust..... 






My first try at using the Rocket 5AC has ended with going back to the Rocket 5M 
after less than 2 weeks... 



The link was at 11.9 miles, with 2 foot dishes on each end. 



The signal was mid 60’s, the link would start at 6x and creep down to 1x. kick 
the station and it would again start at 6x but again go to 1x. 



Thought maybe bad radio, replaced both ends and the same. 



Performance also was terrible with only 30-40 megs udp using 2 Mtk 2011’s on 
each end for test . Put back the Rocket 5M’s, performance has returned. 



I believe that trying to use these in only the 5.7 – 8.4 is not going to work 
in my area. Using another rocket and doing AirView I thought I would have 
enough spectrum. 



The difference was the channels used. The Rocket 5M is on 5500 and the Rocket 
5AC was 5.735 and 5.82... I did try others but these were the best. 



Tim 










_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 




_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to