Litebeam AC

60Ghz Ignitenet

        http://www.ignitenet.com/products/metrolinq/

On 2/23/2017 5:21 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:
AF24 and be done, 740mbps full duplex.

Daniel Peoples
Resonance Broadband
Resonancebroadband.com
918-429-36
20


On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Mark Steckel <[email protected]> wrote:
I have a 2130 ft link using a pair of PBE-5AC-300-ISOs and 30 MHz-wide channel in U-NII 1 working great. Consistently provides 200 Mbps or a bit more.

Based on a few posts on the Ubnt forums, I tried and ended up with better results configuring the radios as PTMP instead of PTP.

Cheers
Mark


----- On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Eduardo [email protected] wrote:

> Hi guys,
> We need a link with at least 120M to join two buildings that are 2,200 ft. from
> each other. Thinking in use the PowerBeam AC ISO that suppose to do 450Mbps.
> I know that the new regulations on the 5GHz have some restrictions on the power
> of the radios that affect the throughput of the link. Trying to understand
> those limitations, but really I could get it totally and wondering if someone
> has a real life experience that can say which of the U-NII (1, 2A, or 2C)
> frequency will work in this scenario and which channel width thinking on 20,30
> or 40MHz. This is a place with a big interference in the 5725-5850 MHz
> spectrum.
> Any suggestion is much appreciate.
> Thanks,
> Eduardo Mejia
> [ http://www.webjogger.net/ | www.Webjogger.net ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to