Out of curiosity why was this not turned on already?

AC should be able to script it. If not I can script it for you. 

> On Mar 12, 2017, at 11:41, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> We have confirmed that extra reporting has to be on for AC APs to see the 
> detail information on the stations button.  So, I have hundreds of radios 
> that now need that feature turned on.  Is there a script or some option in 
> AirControl that I’m missing so I don’t have to log in manually and do 800+ 
> radios?  Or possibly is this something that can simply go into  a firmware 
> upgrade and fix?
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:17 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Nope, no difference. 
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:14 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Didn’t make an immediate difference.  I’m going to try and reboot the AP and 
> see if it sees it then.
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 6:57 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> What about extra reporting? That one seems more important than the AirMax 
> setting.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:55:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
> 
> So what’s weird is that I have a second Rocket AC that has 45 clients on it, 
> and 3 of them came up with names.  The rest are blank.  I checked the AirMax 
> settings and all of them are set at Base, the ones that came up and the ones 
> that don’t.  On the ones that came up, the distance is correct.
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:51 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> We will be testing that tonight. 
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Jesse DuPont
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:47 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Agreed. But it is relevant to the general priority upstream traffic from the 
> SM is given, including this meta information. I shouldn't have had to change 
> it from NONE to get them to stay reliably reachable and  passing traffic, but 
> alas, I did so there's something there.
> 
> Anyway, I wasn't necessarily advocating that he should have to change it, I 
> was more saying that "this" is what I have, how is it different from yours, 
> since our experience was different.
> 
> I also agree, probably just Extra Reporting is disabled on the SMs.
> 
> Jesse DuPont
> Network Architect
> email: [email protected]
> Celerity Networks LLC
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> <image001.png>
> On 2/28/17 2:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I don't believe Airmax priority is relevant to the extra reporting...
> 
>  
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>  
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Jesse DuPont <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Yeah, not so much turning AirMax off, but setting the AirMax Priority to 
> something other than None.
> 
> Jesse DuPont
> Network Architect
> email: [email protected]
> Celerity Networks LLC
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> <image002.png>
> On 2/28/17 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I've always had it on.  I can't remember ever seeing it off...
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>  
> On Feb 28, 2017 3:41 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I will check.  I know we have extra reporting turned off as that was pretty 
> much mandatory in earlier versions of firmware on the 802.11n radios.  We 
> never turned on extra reporting on the CPE side, never had any reason to.  We 
> usually didn’t enable it unless we had an issue we were troubleshooting.
> 
> Jesse, I will make those changes also and see what happens.  I believe that 
> client radios automatically detect AirMax and turn on so I don’t believe we 
> ever turned it on manually.   Do those changes also fix the distance 
> calculation?
>  
> Rory
> 
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of James Craig via Ubnt_users
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:54 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Hi Rory,
>  
> Any chance that you have Extra Reporting disabled on the M units?  Does 
> re-enabling help?
>  
>  
> Steve:  We have replaced AMC/AMQ with isolated capacity.    It should provide 
> better insight to expected performance and in what direction any possible 
> issues might be.  The legacy AC2 java interface doesn't support Isolated 
> Capacity, but this has been added into the replacement HTML5 AC2 client 
> (available in 2.1beta+).
>  
>  
>  
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Steve Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the first time I heard of this Rory.  This bothers me greatly.  I had 
> not tried a AirPrism with only 6.0 clients.  I have only used 8.0 AP with new 
> towers with 8.0 clients.  If you put a 8.0 client on that AP will their info 
> show?
>  
> Ben Moore:
> Is UBNT doing anything about this? That is missing A LOT of important data.  
> Name, device, TX signal would really bother me.
>  
> Also why does UBNT call these AP PtMP airMAX AC is they do not show the AMQ 
> or AMC anywhere.  WE cant use that in AC2 to see the quality of the links.
>  
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> New Lisbon Broadband
> NLBC.COM
> PCSWIN.COM
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 6:44 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> <image003.jpg>
>  
> This is what I’m talking about with 6.0 clients.  No names and the distances 
> are screwed up.
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:59 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> I’ll have to look but why would that matter?  8.0 APs were showing 8.0 
> clients but not 6.0 client names.  6.0 aren’t showing any client names.
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Jesse DuPont
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:02 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on 
> APs
>  
> Rory,
> 
> What is the AirMax Priority set to on your stations having issues on 6.0?
> 
> Jesse DuPont
> Network Architect
> email: [email protected]
> Celerity Networks LLC
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> <image004.png>
> On 2/27/17 6:56 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
> No issues here, but make sure every client is upgraded too. Saw improvements, 
> especially in 900Mhz rockets.
>  
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Roy <[email protected]> wrote:
> XW 6.0 seems to be fine.  Clients are on XM 6.0.  
> 
> Uptime is 8 days so stability seems to be OK.  Reason for 8 days was the 
> massive power outage caused tby the storm in Northern CA.
> 
> 
> On 2/25/2017 5:17 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
> Anyone else having this issue?
>  
> Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO
> 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
> 602-426-0542
> [email protected]
> www.triadwireless.net
>  
> “Baseball - we do not stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because 
> we stop playing”
>  
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>  
> _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
> [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
> [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
> [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to