the AF24 will work as long as you can live with a few minutes of downtime during storms, personally I would put it, much cheaper than licensed!!!
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:32 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Too far for an AF24. Licensed is the only way to go. Look at an AF11X. > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Eric Williams SDWISP <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> Hello my flow Ubiquitiens. I’m looking at installing an Air fiber 24 >> {non HD} on an 8 mile link in south west California with a good line of >> sight. I’m looking for some feedback on real world experiences. I’m limited >> in space on the AP side so I’m looking at the non HD as it is smaller and >> cheaper than HD. Shooting for 500 Megs of true internet traffics download >> and 100 Megs up. Air link is showing signal of -68, 4X 16 QUM at 500 plus >> Megs >> >> I’m on the Daily digest list. Thanks for the feedback >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Eric Williams W7EMW >> >> Network Administrator >> >> 619-698-3904 <(619)%20698-3904> Office >> >> 619-922-6001 <(619)%20922-6001> Support Hot Line >> >> >> >> 9740 Campo Road #211 >> >> Spring Valley Ca 91977 >> >> >> >> WWW.SDWISP.COM >> >> SDWISP Begins Where Fiber Ends >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
