right. and 99.999% of internet users don't need to connect directly do each other. It's just not that big of a deal. Plus, I don't ever want customers to be able to pass traffic between each other at a point that I can't capture it. (read: CALEA). In our network, we have 11 public subnets (a combination of /24's and /22's), customers obtain a public IP from their assigned subnet and all traffic is forced to the core and out to the world.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Jeremy Austin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Adair Winter <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Never, there is always a solution. >> > > The purist in me (yeah, somewhere down there) bridles at a manual > solution, but the pragmatist accepts it. My advertising could read > "99.999999% of Internet reachability!" ;) > > -- > Jeremy Austin > > (907) 895-2311 office > (907) 803-5422 cell > [email protected] > > Heritage NetWorks > Whitestone Power & Communications > Vertical Broadband, LLC > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- Adair Winter VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 C: 806.231.7180 http://www.amarillowireless.net <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
