I’ve upgraded most of ours, I haven’t seen any issues. I didn’t test or look for any improvements though.
Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Chris Soiles Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2017 10:57 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Power Beam M5 question How is 6.0.7 performing? Haven't seen anything Sent from iPhone 6S Plus Chris Soiles Owner Rio Cities csoi...@riocities.net<mailto:csoi...@riocities.net> 505-966-6389<tel:505-966-6389> On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:44 AM, tyson <ty...@wigi.us<mailto:ty...@wigi.us>> wrote: The nanobridge will almost for sure be an xm board and highest firmware I've been running on xm is 5.6.15 I think is what it is. It's the one that also has the Verizon 400mhz fix as an option as well. On xw I've been running 6.04. I know they have 6.07 out but I haven't even looked into newer than 6.04 yet. But regardless of their firmware they should link upl as long as you set so to a channel and width that the station is able to connect to. I'd double check to add uniI rules under system to both sides before throwing them up if it was me. Sent from my Galaxy Tab® S2 -------- Original message -------- From: Eduardo <eme...@webjogger.com<mailto:eme...@webjogger.com>> Date: 9/16/17 8:32 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Power Beam M5 question Hi, Does anyone know if a PowerBeam M5-400 as a CEP will work with a NanoBridge M5-400 as an AP? NanoBridge M5-400 is out of production and I wonder if PowerBeam M5-400 can work as a replacement. Thanks, Eduardo Mejia Webjogger www.webjogger.net<http://www.webjogger.net> _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
