If you do an iPerf test between devices on either end (no other traffic)
you should get close to 150mbps on that link.

The part of the datasheet saying 54mbps that you attached is cutoff before
the chart gets to the meat of it.  In fact, that screenshot only shows the
802.11a modulation scheme rates.  If it's running in 802.11n (or airmax in
ubnt terms), which you are, you'll see it going as high as MCS index 15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11n-2009#Data_rates

The above link has a nice chart that explains what MCS values mean.  You'll
see that MCS 15 should equate to an "over the air" rate of about 270mbps.
Real world throughput it usually just over half of the OTA rate hence
150-ish mbps.  It's still a bit of an ideal thing, and small packets tend
to kill your real world rate pretty quick, especially on these older M
radios that are CPU limited.  But hopefully that gives you an idea of where
the numbers are coming from.

If you replace those radios with their AC brethren, you may need to
compensate for the lower TX power and higher SNR requirements to hit the
higher modulation rates for that level (ie, bigger dishes, better LOS,
etc).  You'll also need to be able to move from a 40mhz channel up to an
80mhz channel.  If you can't do those things, you'll see about the same
real-world throughput as your old radios.  Maybe better PPS if the old
radios were choking on that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac

Marketing is giving the "ideal, best case" at all times and it's best to
drill down into all available documentation for any OEM.

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Jan Van Kort <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 40Mhz, 6mi, 90%, mcs15.
>
>
> On 11/01/2017 03:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > What channel width are you using? How long is the link? How is the
> signal quality? What MCS level are they linking up at?
> > -Mike
> >
> >> On Nov 1, 2017, at 15:49, Jan Van Kort <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I deployed these pbe-m5-400's based on the datasheet that said 150+
> Mbps TCPIP throughput!  Real throughput is 54Mbps!  What is wrong with this
> picture?
> >>
> >> If I replace the pbe-m5-400 with pbe-5ac-gen2 that claims 450Mbps and
> claims to triple the throughput of the pbe-m5-400 what can I really expect,
> 450Mbps or 150Mbps?
> >>
> >> JV
> >>
> >> <real throughput-150+.png>
> >> <real-actual-throughput-54.png>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to