Hmm, not seeing it. But then again, I don't do ANYTHING else in my edge routers.
JP On Wed, 2 May 2018 17:14:28 -0500 (CDT), Mike Hammett wrote > It always happens. Always. > > -----Mike HammettIntelligent Computing SolutionsMidwest Internet ExchangeThe > Brothers WISP > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > From: "J Portman" <[email protected]> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 5:13:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity BGP > > Never saw it. Ran full dual tables (still am). > > JP > On Wed, 2 May 2018 17:01:44 -0500 (CDT), Mike Hammett wrote > > Just natural Internet route table churn will completely fill a CCR core. > > > > -----Mike HammettIntelligent Computing SolutionsMidwest Internet > > ExchangeThe Brothers WISP > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: "J Portman" <[email protected]> > > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:55:42 PM > > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity BGP > > > > CCRs are a bit slow on unstable bgp reconvergence. > > I've been running dual gigabit plus feeds in CCRs for a few years now. My > > feeds are very stable so it was never an issue except during the rare > > reboot. > > > > However, a CHR in VMWARE vastly outperforms the CCR in bgp convergence. > > From boot to full tables in under 20 seconds. > > > > You can get good hardware for sub $2000, add in vmware esxi and build the > > CHR image, 10G licenses for $295. > > > > YMMV, > > JP > > On Wed, 2 May 2018 16:50:48 -0500 (CDT), Mike Hammett wrote > > > You'll need to do your homework on this. A lot of people think CCRs are > > > okay for BGP full tables, but they're not. If they think it's okay, then > > > they simply don't realize they're being screwed over. > > > > > > So you'll have to make sure that whomever says the Infinity is good > > > actually knows what they're talking about. The platforms (CCR and > > > Infinity) have little to nothing in common, but it reminds us all to be > > > cautious. > > > > > > -----Mike HammettIntelligent Computing SolutionsMidwest Internet > > > ExchangeThe Brothers WISP > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > From: "Tim Densmore" <[email protected]> > > > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:45:22 PM > > > Subject: [Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity BGP > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > Can anyone share experiences with the er infinity in regards to BGP > > > performance? I've read several places that it'll take several full > > > feeds with no problem, which is obviously great. However, the few > > > reports I've seen that discuss convergence performance are fairly > > > pessimal. Can anyone shed light on their real world experience with > > > running the er infinity in an environment with eBGP, iBGP, and OSPF? Is > > > it actually taking 15 min to re-converge after a peer is lost? That > > > seems absurdly long to me, but I have zero experience in the $1500-3000 > > > BGP router market so maybe my expectations are unreasonable. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Tim Densmore > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ubnt_users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > Joe Portman > > Alamo Broadband Inc. > > www.alamobroadband.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ubnt_users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > Joe Portman > Alamo Broadband Inc. > www.alamobroadband.com > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users Joe Portman Alamo Broadband Inc. www.alamobroadband.com
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
