<SNIP> Henrik, thanks for the reply. I do, indeed, see the need of more human approach, like structuring wiki according to content levels. My only strong point I ask you to consider is the 'risk' of braking 'autolinking' feature which will only work if not-frequent-wiki-editors (not me or you or anyone who is actively working on a set of contents) know that CamelCasesWords they use, will be linked.
My only fear here is that if editors write CamelCases words on a page and save the page and they see no links to existing pages, then we/they may create new pages that already exist and that were not even detected because they were subpage level. If that happens subpages will turn into an expensive solutions, more expensive than having an unhuman wiki with flat level pages :) So ok, let's try using subpage levels, but can i ask you to please discuss this with Moin devel group in case I am wrong and there are some ways to have healthy subpages structures (sadly, i've been away from that project for about 6-7 months now, but if you want me to discuss it too, you can count on me, of course). -- Cordialmente, Mauricio Hernandez Z. "Hell is repeating someone else's mistakes" (JPS) [Mail escrito sin caracteres especiales o acentos para evitar conflictos de lectura entre sistemas] [En smilar contexto, evitemos enviar archivos .doc, .ppt o .xls. Intentemos enviar solo formatos libres y mas livianos, como lo son .txt, .html, .pdf, .odt, etc.] -- Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
