Hello, 19 works better for me. I am afraid I don't have any Braille devices for testing. I have built latest gnopernicus 1.0 and tested with freetts/newest gnome-mag packages. My testing seemed to be ok. Changelogs show some improvements in Braille and aesthetics.
Doesn't gnopernicus get updated in gnome development? It is part of the gnome desktop tree no? I suppose debian/ubuntu handles non-critical gnome packages differently, but I believe gnome brought gnopernicus into the tree around 2.4. Jason Grieves -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Holbach Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Meeting this week? Hello, Am Montag, den 09.01.2006, 20:21 +0000 schrieb Henrik Nilsen Omma: > Luke Yelavich wrote: > > Do we have an overview of which versions > of 'our' applications have gone into dapper, and which ones have > significant updates available in upstream? > > Looks like this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Accessibility/NewSoftware > still has a lot of TODOs. NEW packages (which never were in Ubuntu before) can wait until FeatureFreeze - package updates have to be done before (or need exceptions). 'gnopernicus' is still a problematic case, since it needs a newer brltty, which has some big changes. I think I'm going to upload them - if stuff breaks too hard, we can still roll back. I'd still need testers (since I don't have any Braille devices), but I'll make that a separate call on the list. > As for the time, I guess 14 and 19 UTC are the usual choices. I'm fine > either way. 19 if I had to pick one. Same here. Have a nice day, Daniel -- Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
