Certainly we should dump the flite dependency, which your patch does I guess. 
If it does operate silently (without asking questions on install or startup) 
and manages not to get in anyone's way then I think we should keep it in. The 
Gnopernicus FAQ (http://www.baum.ro/eng/products/gnopernicus/faq_braille.html) 
seems to suggest that if you compile gnopernicus without brltty available on 
the system then it doesn't add support without re-compiling later. 

That would make it very difficult for people to add it as an extra later. We 
would either need to make sure it is compiled in or offer a second version of 
gnopernicus in universe with brltty enabled.
-- 
brltty needs to install non-interactively
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/39332

--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility

Reply via email to