Hi
Allthough all efforts towards more and better accessibility is welcome I feel
that some fundamentals of linux need to be preserved and guarded in regards to
the prolification of distrobutions with accessibility in mind.
1. Security should be tight and permission granted only when authentication can
be established. Therefor forcing users to use a certain user acount instead of
letting her choose an own acount name is wrong it not only takes away some
security it also it takes away the control from the user. The same thing goes
for the password part. Even if there is a way to change the password afterwords
with a command line.
2. Activevating all accessibility aids from the start is just strange. Its not
intuitive and takes away resources from the user. Again let the user choose
what to use and how to use it! People use linux because Apple and Microsoft
doesn't let them use there computers like they would like to do, so don't make
the same misstake and asume what others want just because you or someone you
know wants it.
3. Letting someone log in automaticaly is not good security and even Microsoft
doesn't do that anymore. Plus ubuntu now come with guest acounts if someone
want to use your computer without your supervision. If a user does want this
they can always change this later but it shouldn't be default.
4. If the accessibility aid can't read menus icons and such as you say you'd
better file a bug since that would be a major problem if it is so. What is the
thought on this from all you others that use Orca and Gnome?! Is Orca
unreliable?!
\Peter
__________________________________________________________
Låna pengar utan säkerhet. Jämför vilkor online hos Kelkoo.
http://www.kelkoo.se/c-100390123-lan-utan-sakerhet.html?partnerId=96915014
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
